🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.